![]() |
January - February 2007 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() Ken Norquay e-mail
|
Heartaches Valentines Day is upon us: the season for human beings to celebrate our emotional nature. For jaded participants like me, this Day of Love has become a day of hollow ritual, a day of cards and chocolates and flowers; a day of tokens of love, not real love. What has happened to my real emotions? Have I forgotten how to feel? When I first realized the shocking state of my emotional life, I felt disturbed. Arent emotions the part of our lives that give us flavour? Is life worth living if we dont get all emotional about it? Have I become a Scrooge? a Grinch? some sort of robotic emotionless Star Trek Spock? My only salvation was that fact that I was feeling bad about not feeling in some perverse way, this made me feel good! Then I realized something important: Im a Canadian, not an Italian. Canadians arent supposed to feel emotions, are we? Emotions are a Latin thing, arent they? Or a French thing Somehow, passion and Canadian dont normally go together. So, no problem: I am not devoid of emotions. Im simply a Canadian! What a relief that was! Then I began to wonder about the irony of being a French Canadian. Canadians are dull and emotionless, but the French are excitable and full of passion. Then I began to wonder about a certain Act of Parliament. In November 2006 Parliament passed a law recognizing The Quebecois as a nation. We, the emotionless ones, were told that this is no different than The Métis Nation or The Mohawk Nation or any other distinct cultural part of Canada. And, it appears we believed it! But there was a time when we would not have believed it. Quebec Separatists would have passionately declared victory! The media would have been FULL of emotional end-ofnation stories. Charles De Gaulle would have risen triumphantly from his grave and said: I told you so! But not this time: folk singer Bob Dylan once sang: The times, They are achangin." Its true: the times have changed. I used to wonder what our neighbours in Quebec would have done if they accidentally did separate from the rest of us. Would their new currency be known as the Que-buck? And would the new francophone central monetary reserve board be called the Que-bank? And would their new fiscal policy be known as Que-bunk? Fortunately for all of Canada, their Que-bark was worse than their Quebite, and Canada got to remain one country. If Bob Dylan had been a stock broker instead of a folk singer, he might have commented: But this time its different. As investors, we need to understand when the markets are emotionally different and when they are emotionally the same. There was a time when the recognition of The Quebecois Nation would have torpedoed the Canadian Dollar and the Canadian Stock Market Why not this time? How can investors tell when to react emotionally and when not to react emotionally? At CastleMoore, our rule is simple: we NEVER react emotionally to any news. News creates emotion. And emotion is poison for the investing mind. Emotion is what makes one sell at the bottom in a panic. Emotion is what makes one buy at the top in the frenzied lust for fast money. Emotion is the investors enemy. For us, news takes the form of boring statistics. Data and crunched numbers. Back-tested statistical models. If the newspapers published what we study, no one would read. If ROB TV televised what we study, no one would watch. Our Investment Committee gets all excited when the computer spits out a buy or sell signal. One of the thrills of the year for CastleMoore was when we bought US Long Term Bonds in June 06 and sold in December. It was a triple header, statistically: clients made money on the price of the bond and on the currency exchange, plus they picked up six months interest. Even if we had produced a flowery press release, I doubt if the Sun would have published it. [Sigh ] In the investment business, there is no season when we celebrate our emotional natures. There is no Valentines Day for investors. No birthdays either. Just many happy returns, hopefully.
Ken can be reached at:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The
True Story About Loss
You may have seen the typical illustration used to highlight the impact of loss upon your investment portfolio. But, have you seen the real impact of that loss, shown in the proper light? The typical illustration used to show the impact of loss upon a portfolio goes something like this:
If you suffer a 10% loss in Year 1, you must directly follow that by an 11.11% gain to get back to square one by the end of Year 2. We have all suffered some type of investment loss over the years; its no big deal. It goes with the territory. But, if we suffer two consecutive years of loss, it gets even harder to achieve the return required to break even. Occasional losses are a normal or expected outcome of investing. No one wins every time. The critical element is to reduce your losses as quickly as possible. Ill talk more about that later. Here is what the typical illustration often overlooks: what it forgets to factor into the equation. What return were the general markets were providing at the time you suffered your loss? If the markets were delivering 8% returns, the true impact of the loss calculation is quite different. Ill call the portfolio that suffers the loss in Year 1 Portfolio A and the one that achieves the market eturn instead of a loss in Year 1 Portfolio B. PORTFOLIO A YEAR 1 LOSS SCENARIO
PORTFOLIO A YEAR 1 GAIN SCENARIO
The next calculation reveals the returned required for portfolio A to catch up to Portfolio B. PORTFOLIO B YEAR 2 GAIN SCENARIO
PORTFOLIO A YEAR 2 RECOUPING LOSS
The chart below paints the picture rather clearly. It shows many scenarios of loss against an average market return rate of 8% and the number of years it takes to recover. Across the top axis is the amount of loss; across the side is return an investor achieves in the years following the loss. As an example I have highlighted in the top row, a 15% loss. The side column shows the annual growth rate in the years following the loss: 13%. The intersection of the two variables reveals that it will take an investor 3.6 years to recover. You can see how astoundingly difficult it is to break even after a significant loss. These numbers reflect a purely mathematical assessment of the impact of losing your capital. Where ever there is the potential to gain, its corollary is the potential to lose. As we have seen, the consequence of loss is severe. Does this mean that a portfolio manager should be so fearful of loss that it impedes his ability to make a profit? No it doesnt. Most of the stock market has a significant component of organic growth to it. By and large, most stocks should be higher today than they were twenty years ago. Most companies inherently grow. (This cannot be said for resource or other heavy cyclical investments. They often experience booms and busts.)
These two points, along with loss avoidance techniques in general, are especially important for those who are approaching or who are in retirement now. The same can be said for investors who choose to over-weight a given industry or sector of the stock market. Remember the technology sector in 1999; or maybe even the resources sector today? The lifestyle expectations of retirees cannot be met by todays fixed income rates alone. Four or five percent is not enough. There must be some equity market exposure. So if you are thinking about retiring or if you are retired, you need investment techniques to avoid loss. And if you are a more aggressive investor who has placed a heavier bet on one or two sectors, your portfolio cannot be managed without techniques to avoid loss. At CastleMoore we have several loss avoidance techniques. Whether with us or with your advisor, we urge you to review your loss avoidance plan. Robert can be reached at: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() Sheldon Liberman Portfolio Manager
|
When You're
Rich, You're Eccentric What do the names Daddy Warbucks, C. Montgomery Burns, Scrooge McDuck, Ritchie Rich, Jed Clampett and Mr. Monopoly all have in common, besides being rumoured to have voted Democrat last November? This group collectively heads Forbes Magazines list of the top richest fictional characters. The top six each has a net worth of over $7 billion. Other notables on the list include:
Of course, when youve amassed that much wealth, fictitiously or otherwise, your idiosyncrasies become eccentricities. A complete listing of the Forbes 15 richest fictional characters can be found at: www.forbes.com/2006/11/14/f o r b e s - f i c t i o n a l - r i c h - t e c h -meia_cx_de_mn_mh_06fict15_sort_3.html (If this doesnt get those who receive this newsletter in print format to switch over to the electronic version, I dont know what will). This is actually the first year that Santa Claus has been excluded from the list, according to Forbes, not because his fictitious wealth doesnt measure up (indeed, he traditionally held down the top spot, or, if you will, the Pole position) but because too many readers wrote the editors insisting that hes real. To the best of my knowledge, none of those who wrote in were my clients; the jurys still out on my colleagues. If you happen to be a fictitious character, you may well find our CastleMoore Model Portfolios useful. They portray our investments methodology and the returns derived there from, without regard to extraneous items like fees, or currency spreads. They are available for perusal from our web site www.castlemoore.com (click on "Model Portfolios" link). If you cannot gain access, its because the system has determined that you are a real person, in which case youll need to register to view them. Please do this only once. [Note to the securities regulator, Revenue Canada, and all mental health professionals reading this: we do not actually have fictitious clients]. But if you are real, we invite you to not only monitor our model portfolios, but to discuss your very real investment goals and constraints. Wed like nothing more than to help you grow more ...eccentric. sheldon@castlemoore.com |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| CastleMoore Inc. helps investors
manage their life savings. We are not stock brokers or mutual fund salesmen. We
arediscretionary investment managers specialising in buy low, sell high
strategies instead of buy and hold strategies like the other guys.
At CastleMoore we manage our clients investments through a methodical and disciplined set of systems that virtually removes any individual bias and emotion from the investment process. What we do works. We rely heavily on loss avoidance techniques when making investment decisions. Our clients are investors that pay particular attention to asset prices, have little tolerance for investment losses, and strong expectations of getting their moneys worth. Clients appreciate CastleMoore's all-inclusive, comprehensive fee schedule. If we are required because of volatile markets, to be more active within our client accounts CastleMoore bears all the costs associated with more frequent transactions. Our teams previous experience in large national firms and small boutiques provides us the ability to deliver a high quality professional portfolio management service while adding truly independent advice to our clients for reasonable costs. A CastleMoore client enjoys the benefits of having focused portfolio management without the distractions of also providing a super market of financial services. We just manage investment portfolios effectively plain and simple. CastleMoore is uniquely superior portfolio management. To know more, including the first step in transitioning your portfolio, contact us. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DISCLAIMER. PLEASE READ: |
This newsletter is not to be considered as offering investment advice on any particular security or market. Please consult a professional or if you invest on your own do your homework and get a good plan, before risking any of your hard earned money. The information provided in The Castlemoore Investment News, a publication for clients and friends of CastleMoore Inc., is intended to provide a broad look at investing wisdom, and in particular, investment methodologies or techniques. We avoid recommending specific securities due to the inherent risk any one security poses to ones overall investment success. Our advice to our clients is based on their risk tolerance, investment objectives, previous market experience, net worth and current income. Please contact CastleMoore Inc. if you require further clarification on this disclaimer. © 2007 Castlemoore Inc. All rights reserved. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment on this Newsletter | Return to Castlemoore Home Page | Printable Copy of this Newsletter in .pdf format
To subscibe to this publication, please send a blank message to newsletter@castlemoore.com.